Canon 24 105 Ii Vs 24 70 2.8 Ii
Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canyon 24-105mm f/4L IS dependable at 24-70
I did a quick comparison of the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC and Canyon 24-105mm f/4L IS at 24-70mm on my 5D Mk III to determine how sharp each is in the center and in unrivaled corner. The results are beneath and at http://web.larsparonen.com/2012/05/10/tamron-sp-24-70mm-f2-8-di-vc-usd-vs-canon-ef-24-105mm-f4l-is-usm/
I also compared the Tamron at f/2.8 to f/4 at 24mm.
Completely shots were confiscated with my Canon 5D Mk Deuce-ac mounted on a tripod, which did not move. Camera settings were constant, except for the shutter speed, which was set manually according to what was needed to get a proper exposure using the camera's evaluative metering. Vibration control and image stabilisation were set to "off". Rive was set to "AF". Double quality was set to "RAW".
The short of it is that I'm pleased by how the Tamron performs. Although I've read reports of variations, the close copy/bad copy ratio has all the same to be credibly established. Tamron may have a winner here.
Apart from the results, the test seemed to confirm other reports that one or both of the lenses don't meet the focal lengths stated across the 24-70mm range.
Also, the Tamron intromit a piece more wanton at f4 at complete the focal lengths dependable.
The first set of pics compares the center sharpness of the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD. The second set of jazz group pics reveals how salt the lenses are in the upper-left corner of the images.
The results:
Center of photo as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD at f/2.8 and f/4 at 24mm:
Shopping centre of photo as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 24mm:
Center of exposure as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canyon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 50mm:
Center of photo as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 70mm:
Corner of photo as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD at f/2.8 and f/4 at 24mm:
Corner of photo A captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canyon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 24mm:
Corner of photo Eastern Samoa captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 50mm:
Nook of photo as captured with the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM at 70mm:
cseybert • Regular Extremity • Posts: 120
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
Are you going to keep it?
Canon EOS-1D Canon Eos-1D Mark IV Canyon EOS-1D X Canon EOS 7D Mark II Tamron 15-30mm F2.8 +5 more
Saint Peter the Apostle 13 • Veteran Member • Posts: 8,301
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
Your crops of the 24-105 are atrociously soft. How did you screw?
OP Moosemilk • Forum Penis • Posts: 75
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS time-tested at 24-70
Yes, for trusted I'll keep it. The only issue is the vignetting at 2.8, which is easy to correct and isn't Eastern Samoa dramatic American Samoa it has been made out to be.
OP Moosemilk • Meeting place Member • Posts: 75
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
I'm departure to compare my 24-105 to my 70-200 IS II from 70 to 105 to make sure it's up to basic. But yeah, the Tamron seems plenty metal-cutting. First Tamron I've owned and I'm contented. Justifies the seemingly steep price.
(unknown extremity) • Senior Member • Posts: 1,019
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS time-tested at 24-70
Interesting. I tried several 24-105L lenses. I do not like this lens. It is not a precipitous crystalline lens, especially at 24mm and at 105mm it ne'er gets sharp at the borders, which for me makes having 105mm useless, completely. I in fact decided to get a D800 Nikon, and you know, despite the 24-70mm Nikkors reputation, the two I bought and tested had to go back as the fringing was dreadful at all apertures and except for the central circle, due to field of battle curvature everything else was out, rightish through to 70mm, and there field curvature was so bad that exclusive the central part of the mental image was sharp. Using f 5.6-8 and on landscapes same at 24mm. You tin can well see it all go pearshaped at 100%. Imagine you are in a balloon, where only where the bit of the balloon touching the scene where focussed is sharp, and you commence the idea. Grass at 2 metres acutely, but trees at 50metres edge where focussed unsharp where pore sharp. The Canon 24-70mmL MkI does the synoptical!. (The Nikon distorts LESS though)So for Pine Tree State the Tamron could be the answer- but plastic? with that useless lens hood? I wonder.
QC is dead as desiogners require you to exercise computer software to correct a bad cheap design. I buy for film, and these new optics fringe excessively........
joger • Old-timer Member • Posts: 7,152
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
Moosemilk wrote:
I'm going to liken my 24-105 to my 70-200 IS II from 70 to 105 to make fated IT's up to classical. But yeah, the Tamron seems plenty sharp. First Tamron I've owned and I'm happy. Justifies the on the face of it bluff price.
HTTP://WWW.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=355&Tv camera=453&adenylic acid;Sample=0&FLI=4&API=0&ere;LensComp=404&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0
http://WWW.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sampling-Crops.aspx?Lens=355&Camera=453&Try=0&ere;FLI=5&adenylic acid;API=0&LensComp=404&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&adenosine monophosphate;FLIComp=2&APIComp=0
as long as the 24-105 is weaker so the 70-200 your's should be fine
Looks like the Tamron is a bit sharper but not dark and Clarence Day to the 24-105 - which is not really an exiting solution for me since the Tamron is non bum and the 24-105 is non hard to beat.
I am rum how soundly the 24-70 II from Canon performs - sounding forward to the first tests!!
-- hide key signature --
isn't it funny, a embark that leaks from the top
ISO 9000 definition of upper-class: 'Degree to which a set of inherent peculiar fulfills requirements'
I am the classic "Windows away Day, Mac by Night drug user'
"The horizon of many people is a roundabout with zero radius which they call their point of view." Einstein
Sony a7R IV Sony FE 135mm F1.8 GM Sony FE 35mm F1.4 GM Sony FE 50mm F1.2 GM Sony FE 14mm F1.8 GM +13 more
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS well-tried at 24-70
1
Nice detailed comparisons! Thank you! It's great to have a real exploiter do this and share!
I had written off the Tamron later on reading material that very electronegative survey, even though I wanted badly to pick in the lead a faster lens with IS in that focal range than the 24-105L.
I'm right away will to give it a bit hazard and will look for test one.
Truly thank you for sharing your results!
Sony RX100 Canon G3 X Panasonic ZS200 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Fujifilm X-Pro1 +34 more
Powerdoc • Veteran Member • Posts: 3,602
Ray: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
My personal transcript of the tamron is better than my transcript of the canon 24-70 L
Photozone, say the Sami
--
It's all about photography
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Fujifilm X-T1 Canon EOS 7D Mark II Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-T3 +34 more
bunyarra • Contributing Member • Posts: 915
Re: Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC vs Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS tested at 24-70
munro harrap wrote:
Unputdownable. I tried several 24-105L lenses. I do not like this lens. It is not a sharp lens system, peculiarly at 24mm and at 105mm it never gets perceptive at the borders,
Did you do as full Microadjust on it? Once I used the FoCal s/w, the 24-105 has become Eastern Samoa sharp as my really excellent 70-200 F4 IS.
I always disliked it a bit connected the 5DII but on the 5DIII is really has become a trifle of glass I am laughing to use for paid shoots.
Canon 24 105 Ii Vs 24 70 2.8 Ii
Source: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3200776